< link rel="DCTERMS.isreplacedby" href="http://sirhumphreys.com" > Sir Humphrey's: Former FBI chief criticises 9/11 Commission, suggests Able Danger programme holds the truth

SIR HUMPHREY'S BLOG

SITE MOVED:Sir Humphrey's has moved

Please join us at our new site: www.sirhumphreys.com.

The RSS feed for sirhumphreys.com is now here.

Friday, November 18, 2005

Former FBI chief criticises 9/11 Commission, suggests Able Danger programme holds the truth

Louis Freeh:
Recent revelations from the military intelligence operation code-named "Able Danger" have cast light on a missed opportunity that could have potentially prevented 9/11. Specifically, Able Danger concluded in February 2000 that military experts had identified Mohamed Atta by name (and maybe photograph) as an al Qaeda agent operating in the U.S. Subsequently, military officers assigned to Able Danger were prevented from sharing this critical information with FBI agents, even though appointments had been made to do so. Why?
Several possible reasons: a Clinton-era official erected an information barrier between intelligence agencies, ostensibly to protect "civil rights". She got herself appointed to the 9/11 Commission. Alternatively: the Defense Intelligence Agency (it ran Able Danger) is trying to hide something, possibly the fact it ignored substantial evidence identifying Al Qaeda terrorists already present in the United States and (in hindsight) involved in planning the 9/11 attacks.
ยท Linked Article

Posted by Antarctic Lemur | 11/18/2005 05:30:00 PM

1 Comments:

Blogger reid said...

To me this is merely a further addition to the millions of pages that already exist testifying to the HUNDREDS of curious aspects to 911 that the media continues to fail to properly investigate.

I just look at people who fail to understand that event in the same way I look at people who still think Kennedy was killed by LHO acting alone and the Warren Commission was a paragon of truth. Evidence says otherwise in both events.

Up to people really to make up their minds, which is possible only if you approach it without preconceptions either way. The magnitude of 911 is such that it's very hard to believe there were black hands manipulating the whole event, however that's precisely what the millions of pages of FACTS truly suggest. And unless you've looked at the evidence in detail, don't bother to come back with "that's just crazy," cause how the hell do you know without looking at it?

11/19/2005 07:16:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home