Looks like Lyndon Hood of Sensitive Flowers
has had a brain spasm, and decided to post the results on the Interweb.
While you're reading Hood's latest attack on Sir Humphrey's
, remember that his blog does not allow comments and that every single one of his posts contains his own wonderful name prominently displayed before the actual post title. Note also that a good 30% of his latest post is based around a conspiracy theory that we are in fact the Green Party in drag, for which he denies personal responsibility by attributing the idea to 'a friend'. This is typical - Hood's posts/comments always seem to be phrased so that if necessary he can later claim they are just a joke, for example his last little hissy fit
aimed at Sir Humphrey's. Maybe Hood's just looking for attention, and once that attention is achieved, he suddenly loses his fighting talk.
Hood also mentions Peter Cresswell
in a negative way: "reading that blog is bad for my blood pressure". I think most people would consider PC a rather mild-mannered writer, if from a pronounced Libertarian perspective. Unlike Russell Brown for instance, PC doesn't perpetuate factual inaccuracies, nor does he ignore the substantial ethical and competence problems of our present Labour Party-led Government. So what's Hoods problem?
Hood could, of course, have posted an item on the rather prominent recent terrorist attacks in London
, but no, apparently Sir Humphrey's coverage is more important to him. How can we argue with that?
So - you go girl *lateral head wiggle*.
[Note to RWDB: your cunning name choice appears to be causing cognitive dissonance
amongst the moonbats. Excellent...]
[Note to other SH authors: suggested catchphrase: 'Causing cognitive dissonance in socialists since February 2005']CORRECTION:
Yes, I misread the PC part
of the post. The original has been substantially re-edited, so the context is now clear when before it was murky.