< link rel="DCTERMS.isreplacedby" href="http://sirhumphreys.com" > Sir Humphrey's: Oops! Photographer says his photo of Clinton has been misrepresented

SIR HUMPHREY'S BLOG

SITE MOVED:Sir Humphrey's has moved

Please join us at our new site: www.sirhumphreys.com.

The RSS feed for sirhumphreys.com is now here.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Oops! Photographer says his photo of Clinton has been misrepresented

Remember the photo of Clinton supposedly enjoying a moment of intimacy with a non-Hillary personage?
"... He [the photographer Clendenin] accuses Klein [author of anti-Clinton book] of taking the photo “out of context” to make it “look like something other than what actually happened.”

“This is one of maybe a dozen people who kissed him on the cheek,” Clendenin said. “It’s like being misquoted . . . I believe that the insinuation of intimacy is a misrepresentation of the photo. It misrepresents my work."
Is Clinton's mouth area now known as his 'cheek'? I know the man debates the meaning of simple one-syllable words, but surely this is a step to far.

The link below has the original photo. I'm not sure if it's any better than the zoomed in version: Clinton is surrounded by at least seven appreciative young ladies, and the one kissing him is clearly using the Feminine Grip of Obsequious Desire. Clinton must emit some powerful pheromones.

The Truth About "TheTruth About Hillary" Mouth-Kissing Photo

Posted by Antarctic Lemur | 6/23/2005 05:46:00 AM